
Following our call With so much Scripture proclaimed today, its difficult to zero in on any other theme except gratitude for Jesus death and resurrection. Yet, at the beginning of Sundays Passion narrative (Mk 14: 1-15: 47), Jesus says something which ties all three readings together; its a concept with which all of us can identify. Defending the woman who poured expensive perfume over His head, Jesus reminds His cruelly critical disciples of one of Christianitys essential beliefs. Leave her alone! He shouts. Why do you make trouble for her? She has done a good thing for me....She has done what she could. From childhood, I was told to imitate saints: people who performed stupendous actions, lived completely unselfish lives, accomplished great things for Jesus and the Church. But I quickly discovered that I really couldnt imitate them. My faith and my world werent the same as theirs. I simply couldnt do what they did. So I bemoaned my fate and consoled myself with just keeping those rules and regulations - the bare minimum - which guaranteed that Id get into heaven one day. Little ways Its clear from the way Mark narrates Jesus passion and death that He didnt intend His followers to do just the bare minimum. Yet His churchs usual practice of canonizing exceptional, high-profile people seems to have dead-ended His plans. Thats why Therese of Lisieux early 20th-century canonization touched something in the hearts of all Catholics. She was the saint of the little way: someone who achieves holiness by simply performing her everyday tasks in an exceptional way. She did what she could. The basic problem with Jesus disciples in this passage is that they have a single, pre-conceived idea of how one is to live his or her Christianity in this context: by well thought-out, non-wasteful acts of generosity to the poor. This womans spontaneous, exorbitant gesture doesnt fit their category. But though they label her action ridiculous, Jesus calls it an action of love: something she was able to do in a way no one else - including those critical disciples - was able to do. Our early Christian authors hold up no one but Jesus to imitate. As Paul reminds his Philippian community (Phil 2: 6-11), Jesus emptied Himself. Whatever Jesus was - however God created Him - thats what He gave. He didnt compare His giving with anyone elses giving. For Him, it was important to give all of who and what He was. Using our talents Such uniqueness is also part of Deutero-Isaiahs third song of the suffering servant: the first reading (Is 50: 4-7). Though most of us stress the suffering the prophet experiences, notice the first part of the passage. Yahweh God, he says, has given me a well-trained tongue that I might know how to speak to the weary a word that will rouse them. Since not everyone has a well-trained tongue, not everyone is sent to rouse the weary. But because Gods given such a tongue to Deutero-Isaiah, he uses it to help others. Our sacred authors presume God also has given us unique gifts, gifts even the greatest saints never had. Biblical writers would be amazed that wed lust after the saints gifts and ignore our own. Notice that Mark describes almost none of Jesus physical suffering in His Passion narrative. Thats because he presumes that almost none of the people for whom he writes will ever imitate Jesus physical pain and death. On the other hand, hes certain the psychological suffering he does describe is part of each Christians life once they start to share themselves with others. Its ironic that the greatest psychological suffering we might be called upon to endure could be generated by other Christians who see us doing something they werent programmed to do, something they dont expect or want us to do. (4/10/03) |